A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
Blog Article
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or Lady do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the few is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
However it's made crystal clear that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also ensure regard of the family get rid of in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been reached. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated above. Read more
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
In the event you find an error inside the content material of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court and also the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions of your decrease (trial) courts usually are not generally published or dispersed.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is often a mandatory requirement as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. Should the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and here decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.